|
First introduced by the International Tropical Timber Organisation
(ITTO) and accepted at the UNCED, standards of SFM (often
referred to as criteria and indicators or C&I) provide
a tool, which can be used to conceptualise, evaluate and implement
sustainable forest management, at the global, national and
management unit levels. Forest management is defined in many
dimensions - economic, social and environmental, and it involves
stakeholders from widely different backgrounds and beliefs.
What exactly constitutes SFM is therefore a matter of agreement
between these stakeholders, both about the scope and the content
of the concept. Criteria and indicators are the "language"
in which these stakeholders express their common understanding
of SFM. However, just as it is unlikely that a single standard
will apply uniformly across the globe, it is equally unlikely
that a set developed for the national level will be applicable
at the forest (management unit) level. Forests, institutions
and people involved in forest management vary to such an extent,
that different standards are required fitting each different
situation.
UNCED set off several international and regional initiatives
to develop standards for SFM. These initiatives involve more
than 100 countries organised in regional groupings. Each of
these initiatives represents government-led efforts of regional
stakeholders to agree on what is SFM in the regional context.
In addition, standards were developed by international organisations
and, importantly, in the context of the certification of forest
products, by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and other
similar organisations operating mostly in temperate and boreal
forests. More and more countries are in the process of developing
and implementing their own national standards, either based
on the government-led international processes (mainly northern
temperate countries), on the ITTO standard (Malaysia) or certification
standards (usually FSC - many countries).
A SFM standard consists of several elements, called principles,
criteria, indicators and norms. They have a hierarchical relationship
to each other in which these elements are organised in a coherent
way. In everyday usage, much confusion exists about these
terms, and their imprecise application leads to poorly defined
standards. Well-defined standards allow stakeholders, to communicate
effectively about sustainable forest management, even if they
are very different or never see each other: for example local
communities and concession holders; producers and buyers in
remote markets, and governments and international bodies.
The Tropenbos Hierarchical Framework provides a systematic
and rational system to relate the elements of a standard to
each other:

Other standards use slightly varying definitions of
principles, criteria, indicators and norms, and other terms
may also be used (such as verifiers (CIFOR), which are more
or less equivalent to indicators).
Overview of existing standards with relevance
to the tropics is provided below:
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/cfv/index_in.html
| Process |
Region |
Download from |
| Government-led/regional processes (only
tropical ones mentioned) |
| Tarapoto process |
Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname
and Venezuela |
Not available |
| Dry-zone Africa |
27 countries in Dry Africa (CILSS, IGADD and SADC subregions) |
http://www.fao.org/montes/foda/wforcong/PUBLI/V6/T374E/2-3.HTM |
| Dry forests in Asia |
Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Mongolia,
Sri Lanka, and Thailand |
http://www.apfcweb.org/Publications/publications.htm
|
| Near East |
30 countries in the near-east |
http://www.fao.org/montes/foda/wforcong/PUBLI/V6/T376E/2-4.HTM
|
| Lépaterique process |
Central American Countries |
http://rds.org.hn/forestal/manejo/criterios_indicadores/zapata.shtml
|
| ATO Initiative |
Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, Ivory
Coast, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria,
Sao Tome e Principe, Tanzania, Zaire |
http://www.fao.org/montes/foda/wforcong/PUBLI/PDF/V6E_T378.PDF
(not complete) |
| ITTO |
World-wide |
http://www.itto.or.jp/policy/pds7/index.html |
| Research-oriented approaches |
| CIFOR |
World-wide |
http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/acm/methods/toolbox2.html
|
| Linked to certification schemes (only
tropical ones) |
| FSC |
World-wide |
http://www.fscoax.org/html/1-2.html
(Spanish)
|
| PEFC |
Europe, Brazil, Malaysia |
No universal set of C&I but country-specific C&I |
| ISO-14000 |
World-wide |
http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/otherpubs/iso14000/index.html
|
| Smartwood |
World-wide |
http://www.smartwood.org/guidelines/forest-management-generic.html
|
| SGS-qualifor |
World-wide |
Not available |
| SCS |
World-wide |
http://www.scs1.com/fcp.pdf
|
| Soil Association/ Woodmark |
World-wide |
Not available |
| National initiatives |
| Bolivia |
National |
Access through http://www.gtz.de/forest_certification/english/standards.asp
|
| Brazil |
National |
| Cameroon |
National |
| Costa Rica |
National |
| Indonesia |
National |
| Mexico |
National |
| Peru |
National |
| Malaysia |
National |
New standard at http://www.mtcc.com.my/
(not yet approved) |
| Ghana |
National |
Not Available |
| Non-timber forest product standards |
| Bolivia |
Brazilnut |
http://www.angelfire.com/pq/cfv/index_in.html
|
| Peru |
Brazilnut |
Access through http://www.gtz.de/forest_certification/english/standards.asp
|
| Gatekeeper scheme |
| Netherlands |
World-wide |
http://www.stichtingkeurhout.nl/verification_oct2002.PDF
|
|
TBI sources
Lammerts
van Bueren, E.M. and Blom, E.M. (1997). Hierarchical
framework for the formulation of sustainable forest management
standards.
|